The principle of undesignedness is a forgotten but brilliant argument which can be used to corroborate Biblical history. In this article, I want to consider a few examples of undesigned coincidences in the Old Testament.
I round off my series by reviewing Carrier’s analysis of what he calls “leading examples” of undesigned coincidences.
Rounding Off My Response to Richard Carrier On Undesigned Coincidences (Part 6) Read More »
I discuss Carrier’s dismissal of coincidences involving the gospels and external secular sources, and his dismissal of undesigned coincidences in the book of Acts.
External Coincidences and Acts of the Apostles: Responding to Richard Carrier (Part 5) Read More »
I review Carrier’s claim that “redaction is usually the better hypothesis.”
Is Redaction Usually the Better Hypothesis? Responding to Richard Carrier (Part 4) Read More »
I continue my response by reviewing Carrier’s allegation that McGrew has fabricated some of her examples.
Who Has Fabricated Data — Lydia McGrew or Richard Carrier? (Part 3) Read More »
In this article, I will consider Carrier’s claim that undesigned coincidences can be adequately accounted for by scribal errors.
Dr. Richard Carrier is an ancient historian who is best known for championing the idea that Jesus of Nazareth is a mythical figure.
Yes, Richard Carrier, There Are Undesigned Coincidences (Part 1) Read More »
In this fifth installment, I am going to address Abu Zakariya’s contention that the Qur’an has the true insight into the crucifixion.
In this fourth installment, I am going to interact with Zakariya’s fourth wave of attack, which is against the premise that the stories about Jesus were passed on reliably.
Were the Stories About Jesus Passed on Reliably? A Response to Abu Zakariya (Part 4) Read More »
In this third installment, I am going to be reviewing Zakariya’s third wave of attack, which is against the gospels as eyewitness testimony.
Are the Gospels Based on Eyewitness Testimony? A Response to Abu Zakariya (Part 3) Read More »