Careful scholarly critique is often very valuable in helping one to refine and better nuance arguments and discover potential vulnerabilities. In the present case, however, the attempted rebuttals offered by John Nelson illuminate the robustness of the arguments rather than their weaknesses.
An argument for Christianity that seldom receives adequate attention is the conversion of Saul of Tarsus (also known as Paul) on the road to Damascus. There exist three accounts of Paul’s conversion in the book of Acts — in chapters 9, 22, and 26. In this essay, I shall lay out in detail why Paul’s Damascus road conversion constitutes powerful evidence of the truth of Christianity.
To avoid begging the question, Coyne must provide a justification, independent of the predictions of evolutionary theory, for believing that (a) an organism much simpler than M. genitalium is viable; (b) that complex enzymes could have evolved gradually from simpler proteins; and (c) that enzymes and coenzymes could have coevolved via rudimentary precursors.
